Participation is not a feature set. It is the product of the structures, platforms, and processes through which people encounter public institutions. When digital infrastructure lowers barriers, surfaces lived experience, and builds trust over time, engagement moves from symbolic to consequential—and public decisions improve.

Personally identifiable information (PII) is the data public systems use to recognize people and make decisions about their lives. In civic contexts, it goes far beyond names and numbers—shaping access to care, housing, safety, and opportunity, and carrying both individual and collective histories.

Democratic institutions are under strain—but their obligations to the public have not changed. Drawing from cross-administration reflections and lived experience, this piece outlines what public-facing institutions owe the people they serve: care, continuity, access, and accountability—especially in moments when trust is most fragile.

Institutional transparency is not just about releasing information. It is about designing systems of openness that allow people to understand how decisions are made, how power is exercised, and how public value is created. This Civic Glossary entry explores what transparency really means in government and nonprofit institutions—and why it is foundational to public trust.

City, town, and county managers are the professional administrators responsible for running local government day to day. This Civic Glossary entry explains how these roles work, how they differ from elected leadership, and why they are central to public service.

Agile practices can support meaningful public outcomes—when government teams lead with clarity. Drawing from recent client engagements, this post explores how public teams can rebalance vendor relationships, strengthen collaboration, and build processes that reflect their mission, values, and responsibilities to the public.

When crisis becomes the operating condition, design reveals what our public systems truly value. This essay reflects on how public-centered design can support prevention, response, and recovery—especially for those who cannot afford failure.

In our first year, Public Servants focused on building quietly alongside public teams. This reflection looks back on the work, the lessons, and the foundations that shaped our approach to public-centered design in 2025.

Government teams care deeply about the people they serve—but unclear roles can lead to confusion, duplicated effort, and missed opportunities. This post explores how product and design teams can clarify responsibility for user needs, strengthen collaboration, and build practices rooted in shared stewardship.